User Tools

Site Tools


eg-navi:20180801_navieg_tel

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
eg-navi:20180801_navieg_tel [2018/08/22 09:56]
LinuxChen
eg-navi:20180801_navieg_tel [2018/08/22 09:57] (current)
LinuxChen
Line 1: Line 1:
 Navigation EG TEL meeting minutes Navigation EG TEL meeting minutes
  
-Date: 2018/08/01 10:00-11:00 AM// +Date: 2018/08/01 10:00-11:00 AM\\ 
-Attendee: Oki(MAZDA), Matsubara(Micware),​ Hashida(TELENAV),​ Hoshina(TOYOTA),​ Momiyama/​Chen(AW)//+Attendee: Oki(MAZDA), Matsubara(Micware),​ Hashida(TELENAV),​ Hoshina(TOYOTA),​ Momiyama/​Chen(AW)\\
 Agenda: Navigation API design review Agenda: Navigation API design review
  
-Q: What's the data format between adaptation(binding) and navigation service?// +Q: What's the data format between adaptation(binding) and navigation service?\\ 
-A: We first consider the JSON, but now we want to use just the C++'s data in group.// +A: We first consider the JSON, but now we want to use just the C++'s data in group.\\ 
-Q: Is it binary(without format)?//+Q: Is it binary(without format)?\\
 A: Yes A: Yes
  
-Q: A generator is mentioned before. so which code is the generated one?// +Q: A generator is mentioned before. so which code is the generated one?\\ 
-A: Basically, all the codes are generated ones.// +A: Basically, all the codes are generated ones.\\ 
-Q: That means maybe we'd like to review the generator and the present codes are just used to review the architecture.//+Q: That means maybe we'd like to review the generator and the present codes are just used to review the architecture.\\
 A: Yes. Present code is just a single pattern. A: Yes. Present code is just a single pattern.
  
-Q: We also need a review of AGL's gerrit reviewer, don't we?// +Q: We also need a review of AGL's gerrit reviewer, don't we?\\ 
-A: Yes, we have done it once but that code is rejected by Yamaguchi(AW).//+A: Yes, we have done it once but that code is rejected by Yamaguchi(AW).\\
 Q: Especially for the binding codes, we need gerrit reviewer'​s review. If we couldn'​t put it into master soon, we may need a Sandbox or something like that in order to do the review as soon as possible. Q: Especially for the binding codes, we need gerrit reviewer'​s review. If we couldn'​t put it into master soon, we may need a Sandbox or something like that in order to do the review as soon as possible.
  
-A: About the name of functions, are they snake case or camel case? I'm told the Window Manager will use the camel case.//+A: About the name of functions, are they snake case or camel case? I'm told the Window Manager will use the camel case.\\
 Q: Currently, we use neither. We will have a check. As Genivi'​s APIs also use neither, we prefer to the current one. Q: Currently, we use neither. We will have a check. As Genivi'​s APIs also use neither, we prefer to the current one.
  
-Q: What about the source repository? Any idea for Gerrit of Github?//+Q: What about the source repository? Any idea for Gerrit of Github?\\
 A: Currently we use Githun for external codes, but Gerrit for codes that are just for AGL purpose. A: Currently we use Githun for external codes, but Gerrit for codes that are just for AGL purpose.
  
-Q: Today'​s review is a pre-review and a gerrit reviewer'​s review is also needed, isn't it?// +Q: Today'​s review is a pre-review and a gerrit reviewer'​s review is also needed, isn't it?\\ 
-A: Yes, we also need a gerrit reviewer'​s review. And we'd like to finish this pre-review in this week.//+A: Yes, we also need a gerrit reviewer'​s review. And we'd like to finish this pre-review in this week.\\
 And for gerrit review, we'd like to ask your help also and hope Mr.Matsubara and Mr.Hashida can make a account for the review. And for gerrit review, we'd like to ask your help also and hope Mr.Matsubara and Mr.Hashida can make a account for the review.
- 
- 
  
    
eg-navi/20180801_navieg_tel.1534931806.txt.gz · Last modified: 2018/08/22 09:56 by LinuxChen