User Tools

Site Tools


eg-navi:20180801_navieg_tel

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Last revision Both sides next revision
eg-navi:20180801_navieg_tel [2018/08/01 05:32]
LinuxChen created
eg-navi:20180801_navieg_tel [2018/08/22 09:56]
LinuxChen
Line 1: Line 1:
 Navigation EG TEL meeting minutes Navigation EG TEL meeting minutes
  
-Date: 2018/08/01 10:00-11:00 AM +Date: 2018/08/01 10:00-11:00 AM// 
-Attendee: Oki(MAZDA), Matsubara(Micware),​ Hashida(TELENAV),​ Hoshina(TOYOTA),​ Momiyama/​Chen(AW)+Attendee: Oki(MAZDA), Matsubara(Micware),​ Hashida(TELENAV),​ Hoshina(TOYOTA),​ Momiyama/​Chen(AW)//
 Agenda: Navigation API design review Agenda: Navigation API design review
  
-Q: What's the data format between adaptation(binding) and navigation service? +Q: What's the data format between adaptation(binding) and navigation service?// 
-A: We first consider the JSON, but now we want to use just the C++'s data in group. +A: We first consider the JSON, but now we want to use just the C++'s data in group.// 
-Q: Is it binary(without format)?+Q: Is it binary(without format)?//
 A: Yes A: Yes
  
-Q: A generator is mentioned before. so which code is the generated one? +Q: A generator is mentioned before. so which code is the generated one?// 
-A: Basically, all the codes are generated ones. +A: Basically, all the codes are generated ones.// 
-Q: That means maybe we'd like to review the generator and the present codes are just used to review the architecture.+Q: That means maybe we'd like to review the generator and the present codes are just used to review the architecture.//
 A: Yes. Present code is just a single pattern. A: Yes. Present code is just a single pattern.
  
-Q: We also need a review of AGL's gerrit reviewer, don't we? +Q: We also need a review of AGL's gerrit reviewer, don't we?// 
-A: Yes, we have done it once but that code is rejected by Yamaguchi(AW).+A: Yes, we have done it once but that code is rejected by Yamaguchi(AW).//
 Q: Especially for the binding codes, we need gerrit reviewer'​s review. If we couldn'​t put it into master soon, we may need a Sandbox or something like that in order to do the review as soon as possible. Q: Especially for the binding codes, we need gerrit reviewer'​s review. If we couldn'​t put it into master soon, we may need a Sandbox or something like that in order to do the review as soon as possible.
  
-A: About the name of functions, are they snake case or camel case? I'm told the Window Manager will use the camel case.+A: About the name of functions, are they snake case or camel case? I'm told the Window Manager will use the camel case.//
 Q: Currently, we use neither. We will have a check. As Genivi'​s APIs also use neither, we prefer to the current one. Q: Currently, we use neither. We will have a check. As Genivi'​s APIs also use neither, we prefer to the current one.
  
-Q: What about the source repository? Any idea for Gerrit of Github?+Q: What about the source repository? Any idea for Gerrit of Github?//
 A: Currently we use Githun for external codes, but Gerrit for codes that are just for AGL purpose. A: Currently we use Githun for external codes, but Gerrit for codes that are just for AGL purpose.
  
-Q: Today'​s review is a pre-review and a gerrit reviewer'​s review is also needed, isn't it? +Q: Today'​s review is a pre-review and a gerrit reviewer'​s review is also needed, isn't it?// 
-A: Yes, we also need a gerrit reviewer'​s review. And we'd like to finish this pre-review in this week.+A: Yes, we also need a gerrit reviewer'​s review. And we'd like to finish this pre-review in this week.//
 And for gerrit review, we'd like to ask your help also and hope Mr.Matsubara and Mr.Hashida can make a account for the review. And for gerrit review, we'd like to ask your help also and hope Mr.Matsubara and Mr.Hashida can make a account for the review.
  
eg-navi/20180801_navieg_tel.txt · Last modified: 2018/08/22 09:57 by LinuxChen